Other Decisions and Orders related to the CAT
Other legal bodies, such as the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, may issue a decision or order which relates to previously issued CAT decision or order. Most often, these decisions or orders from other legal bodies will relate to the enforcement or appeal of a CAT decision or order.
When the CAT is notified of these instances, a summary and a link to the full decision or order on CanLII will be found on this webpage.
- The Applicant appealed the CAT’s decision to dismiss the case in Kong v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 1959, 2021 ONCAT 18 to Divisional Court. On consent of the parties, the Divisional Court ordered that the CAT’s decision be set aside and the case be remitted to the CAT to resolve the remaining issues in dispute. The Divisional Court order specifically notes that the Court has not passed any judgement on the CAT’s interpretation of sections 1.36 (6) and (7) of the Condominium Act, 1998 in the CAT’s original decision.
- Under subsection 1.46 (2) of the Condo Act, a party involved in a CAT case can file an appeal of the CAT’s decision to Divisional Court on a question of law. Halton Condominium Corporation No. 61 appealed the CAT’s decision in Jack Gale v Halton Condominium Corporation No. 61, 2019 ONCAT 46 (CanLII), arguing that the CAT had misapplied the law in reaching its decision. The Court found that the CAT had not made an error in law. As a result, the CAT’s decision was upheld and the appeal was dismissed.
- Thanrani Holdings Inc. applied to the Superior Court of Justice to enforce compliance with an order of the Condominium Authority Tribunal (Tharani Holdings Inc. v Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 812, 2019 ONCAT 3 (CanLII)). As a result, the Superior Court of Justice ordered Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 812 to pay Tharani Holdings Inc. $14,715.91 in costs. This decision demonstrates the importance of complying with the CAT’s orders.